Soldier owes $125k in maintenance arrears

19 November 2017. Thousands of people thronged the city of Harare to participate in the historic march to State House to get rid of President Robert Gabriel Mugabe who has been in power since independence in 1980. The march was preceded by a massive rally by all citizens which have been organized by the Zimbabwe National Liberation War Veterans Association led by Comrades Chris Mutsvangwa, Victor Matemadanda and Douglas Mahiya. Outside State House, the official residence, some people staged a sit-down protest in front of a line of troops. At the same time political parties, human rights organisations and citizens yesterday hailed the Zimbabwe Defence Force for guaranteeing safety of the people as they steeped in to restore sanity in Government. Picture:Moeletsi Mabe/Sunday Time

Harare – A former officer with the Zimbabwe National Army(ZNA) has been hauled before the court on allegations of defaulting maintenance payments for his two children leading to over $125 000 in arrears.

Shupikai Vito (49) appeared before Harare magistrate Rumbidzai Mugwagwa.

He was not asked to plead and he was granted free bail.

The matter was remanded to November 7.

The complainant in this matter is Engeline Zachariah Vito his ex-wife.

Prosecuting, Peter Kachirika alleged that on August 1 2008, Vito was ordered to pay 50% of school fees per term for his then two minor children by a High Court judge.

He was allegedly ordered to pay school fees from September 30 2008 going forward.

All the subsequent payments were to be made on or before the end of each term and the court alleges that he did not pay the said amounts for fees and he is now in arrears of $125 496.

Shupikai and Engeline got married in 1992.

Shupikai filed for divorce against his wife in 2006 while they accused each other of infidelity.

They both agreed that the mother of the children be granted custody but proceeded to trial over the equitable distribution of their house in Borrowdale Brooke.

The High court ruled that the property was to  be sold when both minor children are over 18 and as it stands, the oldest is 26 and the youngest is now 18 but the property has not been sold yet.